Today the Federal Court of Australia issued a
decision in Cancer Voices Australia v. Myriad Genetics upholding the patent
eligibility of three of Myriad's patent claims that recite isolated BRCA-encoding
nucleic acids. Based on my understanding of the Australian court system
(gleaned from Wikipedia) the decision seems to be analogous to a federal
district court decision in the United States, i.e., the case was decided by a
single judge, it can be appealed to the Full Court (a panel of 3 to 5 judges),
and ultimately to the Australian High Court (the analog of the US Supreme
Court). As in the case of the US challenge to Myriad’s BRCA patents, only patent
eligibility is at issue, no other grounds of invalidity (including lack of
novelty, lack of inventive step, lack of utility or lack of fair basis) were
raised.
Looking to Australian precedent, the court held the
claimed nucleic acids to be patent eligible “manner[s] of manufacture” within
the meaning the Australian Statute of Monopolies, because the claimed nucleic
acids constitute “an artificially created state of affairs which has economic
significance.”
Although the Australian court came to the same
conclusion as the Federal Circuit with respect to the patent eligibility of the
claims, it declined to follow the reasoning of the Federal Circuit's Judge Lourie. In particular, the
court rejected Judge Lourie’s conclusion that the isolated DNA claims are
limited to DNA molecules that have been excised from the human chromosome in a
way that requires covalent bonds to be broken. The Australian judge found that
the claims are silent with respect to the length of the claimed nucleic acids, and
that "there is nothing to suggest either in the claims themselves or in
the body of the specification that the complete molecule of DNA as originally
found on chromosome 17 that has been isolated . . . would be outside the scope
of the disputed claims. . . . To interpret the disputed claims [so as to
require that every isolated DNA sequence within the scope of the claims must
have had at least some covalent bonds broken as a result the isolation process]
would require me to impose an impermissible gloss upon the words of the claim.”
I entirely agree with the Australian court,
and think that Judge Lourie was incorrect on this point.
In reaching its decision, the Australian court found
it to be significant that:
(1) The Australian High Court had previously interpreted
the scope of patent eligible subject matter expansively, and "made clear
that metaphorical analysis may not be helpful in determining whether or not
something constitutes patentable subject matter” [our US Supreme Court might
benefit from this approach];
(2) “[I]n the absence of human intervention,
naturally occurring nucleic acid does not exist outside the cell, and ‘isolated’
nucleic acid does not exist inside the cell;” and
(3) "It
would lead to very odd results if a person whose skill and effort culminated in
the isolation of a micro-organism (a fortiori, an isolated DNA sequence) could
not be independently rewarded by the grant of a patent because the isolated
micro-organism, no matter how practically useful or economically significant,
was held to be inherently non-patentable.”
The court
noted that it is “trite law that you cannot patent a discovery, but if on the basis
of that discovery you can tell people how it can be usefully employed, then a
patentable invention may result.”
The court made a number of other important observations:
(1) “The
disputed claims are not to genetic information per se. They claim tangible
materials. Much emphasis was placed by the [patent challengers] upon the informational
character of DNA as a storehouse of genetic information. But the disputed
claims are not to information as such. They could never be infringed by someone
who merely reproduced a DNA sequence in written or digitised form.
(2) “Because
each of the claims is to an isolated chemical composition, naturally occurring
DNA and RNA as they exist in cell are not within the scope of any of the
disputed claims and could never, at least not until they had been isolated,
result in the infringement of any such claim."
(3) “
[Australian precedent] does not require the Court to ask whether a composition
of matter is a “product of nature” for the purpose of deciding whether or not
it constitutes patentable subject matter. [Precedent] recognises that it may be
unhelpful to approach the problem in this way. I think this is especially so in
the field of biotechnology in which micro-organisms play a critical role in the
development, manufacture and use of diagnostic and therapeutic products and
techniques.”
(4) “[Australian
precedent] does not require the Court to ask whether a micro-organism is
“markedly different” to something that already exists in nature for the purpose
of deciding whether it constitutes patentable subject matter (cf. Chakrabarty
at 310).”
(5) “In
the context of biological material, an artificial state of affairs may manifest
itself in different ways. The physical properties of the naturally occurring
material may have changed as a result of it having been isolated. But even if
the physical properties of the material have not changed, the removal of the
material from its natural environment and its separation from other cellular
components may still give rise to what might reasonably be described as an
artificial state of affairs. “
(6) “In
my opinion the patentability of the isolated nucleic acids referred to in the
disputed claims does not turn upon what changes have been made to the chemical
composition of such substances as a result of them having been isolated. In
particular, the question of whether these substances constitute patentable
subject matter does not depend upon the type of chemical bond that may have
been broken in the process of isolating them.”
The court also found significant, although not determinative, the fact that the Australian Parliament had considered and rejected proposals to limit the patenting of isolated nucleic acids, as well as the long-standing practice of the Australian patent office to grant claims to isolated nucleic acids.
In short, the decision of the Australian court
broadly supports the patent eligibility of not only isolated DNA, but more
generally isolated naturally occurring molecules. It is entirely consistent with the
long-standing interpretation of the US patent office, and the general understanding in the US
prior to the Myriad case, that isolation of a naturally occurring molecule can
constitute sufficient human intervention to satisfy the requirement of patent
eligibility. It rejects many of the arguments being raised in the US by ACLU/PubPat
and their supporters.
31 comments:
I found lots of interesting information here. The post was professionally written and I feel like the author has extensive knowledge in this subject. Partywear suit
The substance you are penning blows out my nous.
no win no fee claims
The substance you are penning blows out my nous.
no win no fee claims
I totally love this site! All of your posts make me smile! You had a great example this is apply to manifesting a relationship /marriage/anything intangible?
Hi
The Post seems to be good I really Like your Post very much thanks For sharing this awesome Post
rejuve health clinics
Hi there, awesome site. I thought the topics you posted on were very interesting. I tried to add your RSS to my feed reader and it a few. take a look at it, hopefully
I can add you and follow.
No Win No Fee
Factor Quema Grasa
Factor Quema Grasa Pdf
Libro Factor Quema Grasa
Factor Quema Grasa Gratis
Factor Quema Grasa Descargar
Factor Quema Grasa Descargar Gratis
Factor Quema Grasa Libro
Factor Quema Grasa Libro Gratis
Factor Quema Grasa Pdf Gratis
This lawsuite stuff just goes on and on.
Some solicitors will be promising for high quality service at rock bottom cost but they will charge many extra fees for their service while closing the case and some solicitor will yield zero result.Solicitors north Sydney
This is really awesome and i love that..Apple Ibeacon This is very unique thing you put on that post.. Thanks for sharing..
This is a great post. I like this topic.This site has lots of advantage.I found many interesting things from this site. It helps me in many ways.Thanks for posting this again.China heated battery manufacturer
Thanks for sharing this quality information with us. I really enjoyed reading.
----
apply baixar facebook and descargar whatsapp para android and apply baixar facebook movel
I thoroughly enjoyed reading it in my lunch time. Will surely come and visit this blog more often. Thanks for sharing..drs hd recuperacao de dados
You’ve got some interesting points in this article. I would have never considered any of these if I didn’t come across this. Thanks!.limo Brooklyn
OPY World School is promoted and managed by Rao Mohar Singh Education Society with the mission to provide quality education at school level.facelift atlanta
I haven’t any word to appreciate this post…..Really i am impressed from this post….the person who create this post it was a great human..thanks for shared this with us.key west wrist injury attorney
You have a very inspiring way of exploring and sharing your thoughts. It is very uncommon nowadays, lots of sites and blogs having copy pasted or rewritten info myvintage.co.uk
Regards for your reviewed arrangement! My admit admit mate along catalog arrangement in ordain to i obligatory status my hold guarantee in addition i favorite receive smaller that could, an appropriate atomic inception fabricate upwards an fabulous director.web icons
You are awesome!! I am loving your blog! Keep up the great work!legalrecruitment.net
Not so they don't live homework however tailor gap doesn't wicked children can't education their determine plus trace talents to baffle them from slipping.postings.com
I haven’t any word to appreciate this post.....Really i am impressed from this post....the person who create this post it was a great human..thanks for shared this with us.rent a yacht in maimi
This is the best application on the drop today. There access to enjoy great moments of relaxation:fx compared
I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but it really compensated for my time. I will post a link to this page on my blog.purpose of refinancing a home
I have already bookmarked this blog. This article is way better than the previous articles I've read.I really enjoyed reading this post and I totally agree with your opinion. Keep up the great work. Thanks a lot!legal reputation
Thanks for letting us know about the new update. Features seem up to date with the current technologies avail in the market. Addition of the serial stack seems a plus point to me.combat training
I was looking at some of your posts on this website and I conceive this web site is really instructive! Keep putting up.Lithium polymer battery
Just like in brick and mortar stores you can also find discount shopping online as like anything else you can find anything you want with only a few clicks of the mouse. While the brick-and-mortar is a plus for getting outdoors it can also be inconvenient and stressful.contract repository
This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. This is very nice one and gives indepth information. Thanks for this nice article.how does a construction loan work
You can buy from our large and diverse collection of salwar kameez, party wear suits, Bollywood collection, cotton Kurtis, Anarkali suits, Bollywood saree and many other products.50s fashion
It's unlikely that any on the photographs had been considered less than 6 days in the past.sexual harassment lawyer
Thank you so much for the post you do. I like your post and all you share with us is up to date and quite informative, i would like to bookmark the page so i can come here again to read you, as you have done a wonderful job.slotenmaker den haag
Post a Comment